• Tory betrayal on Charing Cross Hospital goes straight to the top

    The Conservative Party have serious and grave questions to answer over their reckless and irresponsible plans to shake-up West London’s A&E departments.

  • Westfield expansion misses housing target

    Boris under fire as housing targets for Westfield fall far short

  • Election Special E-News

    All change in H&F

    As the dust settles from last week’s elections, it’s clear that Labour did well all over London but particularly in Hammersmith & Fulham

    Swings of up to 15%  from the Tories give the new Labour administration a working majority in a borough which had previously been considered a Conservative stronghold

  • When Cameron's favourite council went Labour

    It has been a long and hard-fought campaign but on Thursday the people of Hammersmith & Fulham voted for change.

    Labour gained 11 seats from the Conservatives giving control of the Council by 26 seats to 20.

    I wish the departing councillors, from both sides, good luck in the future, and would like to pay special tribute to those candidates that narrowly missed out.

    This result was the feather in the cap for a series of stunning victories across London for the Labour Party.

    By voting for Labour, the residents of H&F rejected some of the more arrogant and self-serving policies that the Conservative administration pursued here and endorsed the local Labour Party’s decision to put saving our hospitals at the centre of our campaign.

    Under Labour Leader Stephen Cowan, a fine team of candidates and activists offered an alternative to a Tory administration that put the interests of property developers and overseas investors before local residents.

    During months of doorstep conversations and meetings with constituents the same issues came up again and again.

    Families unable to pay the Bedroom Tax facing eviction, patients worried about A&E closures, parents angry at the closure of good schools like Sulivan, and young people unable to find a home to rent or buy.

    I saw every week in my surgery that under the Coalition Government and the Conservative council the most vulnerable in society were being victimised and marginalised.

    Rightly, this concerned many people irrespective of their own circumstances and on Thursday, they voted the Tories out.

    This reflects the same message that Labour Leader Ed Miliband has been talking about nationally: that economic recovery must help those at the bottom, rather than just a wealthy few.

    It is also an indictment of David Cameron’s judgment. He visited last week in an attempt to sure up the Tory vote but he was ill-informed or deliberately misleading about the proposals to demolish Charing Cross. Boris Johnson also featured prominently on Tory leaflets, to no avail.

    People believed the evidence of their own eyes above what Cameron and Johnson had to say. And they rejected a Conservative ideology which seeks to privatise and downgrade the NHS, sees providing affordable housing as a ‘hand out’, and tries to demonise and divide people.

    I look forward to a new way of working with and listening to residents under the Labour Leader of Hammersmith & Fulham Council, Stephen Cowan. He will be the first to say, the hard work starts here.



    Media Roundup

    Dave Hill's London Blog - Early Gains for Labour in London

    Inside Housing - Flagship Sunk

    Get West London - Shock as H&F falls to Labour

  • New hospital crisis exposes Cameron's untrue statements on Charing Cross Hospital

     I discovered today that the final decision on the future of Charing Cross, Hammersmith and St Mary’s Hospitals – the three major hospitals run by Imperial Healthcare Trust – which was due to be made next Wednesday 28 May has been further postponed until 30 July at the earliest.

    This means the announcement on the future of our borough’s two hospitals has now been delayed for almost a year.
    The reason is not a re-think about the closure of both A&Es and demolition of Charing Cross but another financial crisis.
    Amid major changes to the management at Imperial, the money is simply not there to fund ‘integrated care’ and the switch from acute to primary care services.  The promise to improve GP and other community services before any cuts are made to accident and emergency cannot at present be met.

    However, there is no reprieve for the emergency services already marked for closure.  Imperial and the local NHS – and of course the Coalition Government and Conservative Party in H&F - are continuing to support the closure of Hammersmith’s A&E this year and the demolition of Charing Cross with the loss of all consultant emergency services.

    In the words of Medical Director, Dr Mark Spencer “Ealing and Charing Cross would be designated local hospitals and would provide a GP led service.  They would not take blue light patients.”.  His comments were recorded at the health scrutiny committee for NW London, chaired by Hammersmith Tory Councillor Lucy Ivimy.  

    The worsening crisis in our local hospitals makes David Cameron’s wholly false statement about Charing Cross appear even more cynical.  Below is the letter I wrote challenging him on the false statement he made in Hammersmith last week.

    I am not expecting much from the reply. The PM has form for dodging tricky questions - as Labour Leader Stephen Cowan found out in 2010 when the PM last got caught out spreading mistruths about what the Tories were really getting up to here.

    In his latest blog Stephen asks "Did David Cameron Mess Up Or Was He Deliberately Trying To Mislead Residents About H&F’s NHS?"

    Either way H&F residents deserve better.

  • Vote for our hospitals and to save our borough from developers this Thursday

    This Thursday, 22 May, Hammersmith & Fulham residents will elect a new Council and London members of the European Parliament.

    Readers of my E-news will know my opposition to H&F Conservative Council’s housing policies, their support for demolishing Charing Cross Hospital and closing both borough A&Es, and their willingness to climb into bed with any luxury developer or property speculator.

  • Cameron's visit and why we need to win on 22nd May

    Last week we were graced by the presence of the Prime Minister as David Cameron made a bizarre flying visit to Hammersmith. In a visit to meet Conservative councillors that was both short and unexpected (including to them), the PM did not bother to meet actual Hammersmith residents.  He then went on to declare his support for the demolition of Charing Cross Hospital, airport expansion, and the sale and demolition of council homes. 
    The Tory’s Parliamentary candidate commented: “We didn’t ask him to come here.” and that Cameron’s visit was “very smoke and mirrors”. Which says a lot about them both.

  • Save our Hospitals on the 22nd of May

    In less than two weeks, London votes in Council – and European – Elections.

    One issue has dominated this election campaign – and indeed politics in Hammersmith & Fulham for two years: the Government’s proposals to demolish Charing Cross Hospital  and close the A&Es both there and at Hammersmith Hospital.

  • Damning Report on Hammersmith Housing Crisis

    Housing Crisis in Hammersmith Fuelled by Council Policy to Cut Affordable Homes

    New research published today reveals how Conservative-run Hammersmith & Fulham Council has helped create the housing crisis in the borough.

    Selling off council homes on the open market, emptying and demolishing blocks of affordable flats, allowing developers to make excess profits by including no low-cost homes in major schemes, manipulating statistics to hide housing need and classing households on incomes of £80,000 as a priority for rehousing are some of the techniques used to alter the social make up of the borough.

  • Hammersmith & Fulham Chronicle to close

    Closure of the Chronicle

    As many of you will no doubt already know, the Hammersmith & Fulham Chronicle is to close on the 25th of April, leaving Hammersmith & Fulham as the only London Borough without a local newspaper.

    I was very sad to hear this, having been a reader for the best part of half a century and a columnist or correspondent for almost 30 years. I recently submitted what may well be my final column in the paper.