Government cuts leave vulnerable families exposed

Hammersmith’s most vulnerable families set to lose key funding, warn children’s charity

More than £170m of funding for emergency grants and essential support to help families in a crisis is under threat from Government cuts.

According to a report prepared by the Children’s Society, Hammersmith and Fulham Council will lose £588,581, which would have been able to support 4,747 households. 

Tory Ministers are seeking to withdraw all support from Local Welfare Assistance Schemes, the last line of defence for over one million vulnerable households across England each year.

Hammersmith MP Andy Slaughter, said: “Hard working families in Hammersmith are already being heavily squeezed by this out of touch government. Cutting this emergency support during such tough times seems misguided and callous. The Tories should think again about scraping this scheme.”

The schemes, which are run by local councils, help get struggling families back on their feet and prevent a temporary financial crisis from spiralling into debt and outright destitution.

They have helped women fleeing domestic violence to buy an oven for their new home, parents visit their sick child in hospital, and low income families heat their home if they face an emergency cost such as a broken boiler. 

This year £172m was shared between local authorities in England – enough to help 1.2m families who might otherwise have had to cut back on food or heating or take out a loan to repair or replace an essential item.

However, the Government is now consulting on its plans to withdraw all funding from next April.

While local authorities would have the option of retaining their schemes by finding the money from elsewhere, a recent Local Government Association survey found that almost three quarters (73%) of cash-strapped councils would either end or scale back their local scheme if the funding was abolished.

The Children’s Society is calling on the Government to reverse its decision and retain funding for the schemes.

Matthew Reed, Chief Executive of The Children’s Society, said: 'The Government should think again and make sure all local authorities have dedicated funding to provide this vital safety net.'

Mother-of-one Lucy, whose family benefited from their local welfare assistance scheme after her one-year-old daughter became very ill, said: “The cost of visiting our baby in different hospitals and looking after her when she had heart surgery meant we had no money left to buy her the bed she needed. The Council scheme helped us when we needed help most. Without it we would have ended up back in debt.'

More information

• Details of the Government’s consultation, which closes on 21 November, are available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/local-welfare-provision-in-2015-to-2016
• The funding currently provided for local welfare assistance schemes – £172m per year – is enough to help 1.2m households across England, based on the £124 average claim from the Social Fund, the national scheme which was replaced by local welfare assistance schemes in 2013.
• More information about the Local Government Association’s survey that found almost three quarters (73%) of councils would either end or scale back their local scheme if the funding was abolished, is available here: http://www.local.gov.uk/web/guest/media-releases/-/journal_content/56/10180/6583322/NEWS
• Find out more about The Children’s Society’s campaign to save local welfare assistance here: http://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/cuttoofar 

Do you like this post?

Showing 2 reactions

@hammersmithandy tweeted this page. 2014-11-09 17:00:09 +0000
Andy Slaughter MP posted about Government cuts leave vulnerable families exposed on Andy Slaughter MP's Facebook page 2014-11-09 17:00:09 +0000
Government cuts threaten to leave vulnerable families exposed